Ultra wide angle lenses for Nikon? - ultra wide angle lens minolta x-700
Has anyone suggestions for glass Ultra-wide angle to Nikon. I have 2 now in the eye, the Sigma 10-20 and Nikon 12-24. The price is not really a problem, a kind of why I always lean to the Nikon (resale, quality,) the name is. This need not be a zoom lens instead. In fact, just looking for suggestions at this point. Perhaps a diamond in the rough out there who may not be seen.
Sunday, February 7, 2010
Ultra Wide Angle Lens Minolta X-700 Ultra Wide Angle Lenses For Nikon?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
4 comments:
Nikon 12-24, I and my friend owns Sigma 10-20
Shooting Sigma marriage and was not available at first. My friend wanted to buy an extra wide-angle and, after my pictures.
At first I thought I had expected, but with the color images are compared with the Sigma is slightly off. Skin tone was not as nice as the Nikon. At first I thought it might be difference in the camera settings, then mounted his lens on my D70. And certainly no difference in color images.
I'm) very satisfied with 12-24 lens for photography of events (festivals, and dance. Almost never received less than 12 mm, a 2mm would not help anyway.
Good luck.
===
Do not forget, for the best answer - please - every vote.
FACT: You also get 3 points if your vote for the best answer
Although I have not seen the Nikon in detail, I swear on my life is better than Sigma. I'd never buy a bad experience with Sigma Sigman, and never a new one if my life depended on his career.
However, the wide angle I, the Tamron 11-18. It's nice to have, and since I am one of the most expensive photographer in New Zealand, I would say, should be a good target for my clients have continued to flow.
To the raw material for this view, send me an email and we will send you some.
It is a little on my site in the context of marriage and business sides www.straightshots.co.nz
My email is mason@straightshots.co.nz
Fixed focal length lenses are always better than a zoom and can be cheaper (but not much, because they usually have a better opening. Looking) have so decided, exactly what we want this angle I would be the focal length for most select suitable to my purpose and keep it.
And that brings us to another question: how will you use this aim? I have a 24mm, which is rarely used because it is an end to wide angle. 24 starts, to a certain bias to show, but can be partially controlled by the right of the lens. Nothing more, and increasingly a focal length of lens distortion or niche or special effects that will be tough.
The only reason I bought was used, because they and a very good price. Whenever I needed something more, I rented the lens. Only happened twice that I remember what it was a great savings.
If the concern is not money to go always with the best. Off brands can sometimes be too surprising that some goals Tamron 300/2.8 (unless, BACK, as if I spent a lot of time checking of the Arts). I also have a brand outside Doubler coordination for my Hasselblad system was absolutely unbelievable. But these are rare and should never be without a thumbs up from some photographer (s) or be considered a test of the lens. Finally, glass is a good piece of image quality.
I hope that helps.
You can also validate the Tokina 12-24 - has some good reviews. The Nikon 12-24 is highly regarded, but the Tokina seems to be a bargain for the performance. Personally, I will probably go with the Nikon, but would save a bit first!
Post a Comment